Tuesday, April 4, 2017

Cross Talks #3

RECONCILED

“Reconciliation” is one of the sweetest words in the context of relationship. Anyone who has suffered a disruption in relationship longs for reconciliation. “Reconciliation” is also often misunderstood.
            Two people who have not seen each other for years because of job or distance or other circumstances cannot be said to be reconciled when they finally meet. That is not reconciliation; that is reunion.
            And if you have a friend or family member who has wounded you somehow and they don’t admit it, and you decide to pretend it never happened, you are not reconciled. You might call that forgiveness, but it is not reconciliation. The issue has not been confronted; the matter is not settled.
            To “reconcile” is to bring enemies into a state of friendship, to overcome alienation, and to create a mutual compassion. Reconciliation is the healing of broken relationships, the settling of the cause of their hostility so that they can live together.[i]
            If you have been alienated in some way, and known the cold shoulder and icy remarks of one you formerly loved, and if you know that insurmountable chasm that separates you from your friend, sister, brother, etc., then you long for reconciliation.
            And this is why, of all the metaphors for the application of the cross of Christ, reconciliation is the most popular image. We get it. “Propitiation” is temple language; “redemption” is slave language; “justification” is legal language – but “reconciliation” is the most personal. This is heart language; this is the language of home, of family, or of relationship.
            So the question we want to look at this morning from 2 Corinthians 5:18-21 is this: How does the image of reconciliation help us to understand the impact of the cross of Christ in our lives?

God Made the First Move

The first thing we need to know about reconciliation is that we have been reconciled to God. Our relationship with God was disrupted by sin. And sin rendered us powerless; it stole our desire to come to God; sin made us resistant to God’s person; and therefore we were hostile to God. We were enemies of God. The result of our sin may surprise you, but God was not too happy with us. We were his enemies.
            Here is where things get quite odd. God is the offended party. The problem of sin is incomparably more serious on his side than on ours. If I were an offended party, my natural human reaction would be to wait until the offender apologizes and makes amends. But God doesn’t do that. God makes the first move. God initiates reconciliation.
            Paul uses clear language to tell us this: “All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled himself to us…” (18a) and “in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself…” (19a). God is the subject of these verses; God does the acting. God reconciles; God gives; God appeals. We may feel some remorse and want to apologize, but in reality we were powerless to do so. We have nothing to offer, to contribute, to plead – God does it all. The only thing I can contribute to reconciliation and my redemption is my sin.[ii]
            God is the author of reconciliation. And since we were in a helpless position, only God could remove the cause of his own anger against us. And he did this when we were his enemies, (see Romans 5:8, 10-11). How remarkable is that?
            In 1492, two Irish families, the Ormonds and the Kildares, were in the midst of a bitter feud. The feud became an all-out fight, with the Kildares besieging the Ormands. The Earl of Ormand and his family finally took refuge in the chapter house of St. Patrick’s Cathedral. But the Earl of Kildare realized that the fighting was getting out of control. These two families worshiped the same God, in the same church, but were trying to kill each other. Kildare called out to Ormand and promised not to seek revenge or try anything nasty. He wanted the feud to be over. But the Earl of Ormand thought it was a trick and refused to come out. So Kildare used his spear and hacked a hole in the door and thrust his arm through. After a tense moment, his hand was grasped by another on the inside. The door opened and the two men embraced, ending the feud.
            God took the initiative and chopped a hole through the hostility that separated us from himself and offered his hand.

Christ was the Means of Reconciliation

If God was the author of reconciliation with us, Christ was the means through which he accomplished reconciliation.
            Again, the language Paul uses clearly makes Jesus the agent of reconciliation. “All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself…” (18b).
            Notice that the event of reconciliation is past tense. We have been reconciled to God through Christ.
            The first thing to note affirms what we have already said: God was doing something here and he did it through Christ.
            The second thing we should note is not detectable in English. The tense indicates that the work of reconciliation is a finished work. It’s complete. There’s nothing more to add. It is not something which is being done (like sanctification) but something that is simply done – finished. What Christ did on the cross was more than enough to bridge that chasm, that mountain, that obstacle that kept us from God. It is no wonder that Jesus cried, “It is finished!”
            Once more, as if to emphasize the point, Paul reiterates that God accomplished reconciliation with Christ as the agent. “In Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them…” (19a). This is almost word-for-word with v. 18 but with subtle differences.           Paul first said “through Christ” but now says “In Christ God…” inferring that this act was a Father-Son work. It would be wrong to think, as some have thought, that God’s anger would not be satisfied until his own Son hung grotesquely bleeding from a cross. Jesus did not have to die to convince his Father to stay his wrath from us. Rather, we see a mysterious oneness in Father and Son as they work to bring reconciliation to bear.            Of Christ it is written, “For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross” (Col. 1:19-20).        
            That Paul now references the world reveals that God’s intention was that reconciliation was meant to be universal. The hand thrust through the door of reconciliation must be grasped, however. You and I must receive in faith what Christ has done.
            But wait, what has God in Christ done for us? Paul wrote, “For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin…” (21a). To be honest, I either forget this profound truth or cannot grasp the impact of it in my life. So I don’t blame you if you struggle with this concept. Christ became sin, not that he sinned, but took on our sin and became as one who bore all our sin.
            A young monk was struggling with his own sins and was quite distressed. Martin Luther wrote to this monk and said this, “Learn to know Christ and him crucified. Learn to sing to him and say ‘Lord Jesus, you are my righteousness, I am your sin. You took on you what was mine; yet set on me what was yours. You became what you were not, that I might become what I was not.”
            How do you grasp that? Yet here it is. Our sins are not counted against us. The Psalmist said, “If you, O LORD, kept a record of sins, O LORD, who could stand” (Ps 130:3). Jesus became sin “so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (21b).
            I believe Luther’s advice is worth meditating upon.

We are the Medium of the Message

Marshall McLuhan coined the phrase “the medium is the message.” You may have heard of this before. It means that the medium conveys the message so closely that the characteristics of the medium reflect the message itself.
            That’s kind of what Paul means when it comes to the ministry of reconciliation. First he says, “All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation” (18). Then he adds that God entrusted “to us the message of reconciliation” (19c). And finally, “Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God” (20).
            What does it mean to be an ambassador for Christ? It means to represent Christ with authority. That authority comes not solely from presenting the King’s message, but more so from being the King’s message. On the one hand, yes, we proclaim that God in Christ reconciled the world to himself. But on the other hand, we demonstrate what that means in ourselves.
            Paul said, “Be reconciled to God.” That’s the first step. Then the second step is to show that we have grasped the meaning of reconciliation in our own relationships. For you see, it is impossible to be reconciled to God while remaining unreconciled to one another.
            Remember Jesus’ parable of the unmerciful servant (Mt. 18:21-35)? The king forgave the servant’s debt amounting to millions of dollars, but this servant turned on a fellow servant who owed him only a few bucks. What he demonstrated was a failure to appreciate mercy by showing mercy to others.
            In the same way, God has shown incredible love by reaching out to us through Christ, paying the price for our sin on the cross, and reconciling us to himself. We cannot be the church of Christ, proclaim the message of reconciliation, without being reconciled first to God, and then to each other. To live in estrangement from fellow believers alienates you not only from those people but from God as well. That’s the negative angle.
            The positive angle is that when we do forgive one another, make peace in our relationships, and walk together in love, we become the message of reconciliation. People will see that we are followers of Jesus when we love one another.

There is a difference between reconciliation and forgiveness. On the cross, Jesus provided for the forgiveness of everyone. But not everyone will be reconciled with him because they will not accept what Christ is offering them.
            The same is true for you and I. You can forgive someone who hurts you, even if they don’t seek reconciliation. But there won’t be reconciliation unless you can overcome the enmity that exists between you.
            If we follow God’s model – and it won’t be easy – we will reach out to the one who offended us and talk, work it out, and find resolution. You might wait a long time for the other person to apologize if you don’t reach out.
            I think that pride blinds us to the reality of most situations. Unlike God, we are not totally without blame. In fact, because of misunderstanding or missing facts, we all share in the causing of the wound. Because I have a sensitive conscience, I have at times been racked with conviction. I have felt more righteous than I should. Then, when I can’t stand it anymore, I go and apologize for my part in the trouble. I don’t like being wrong. But I often have something that I am wrong about in those situations. My belief is that both sides need to come clean and forgive each other.
            How does the message of reconciliation help us to understand the impact of the cross? It is life-changing. It can free you from your sin and guilt when you realize how much God loved you even when you were his enemy. And it can free you from the unnecessary antagonism you feel in so many of your relationships. Let me say this: In this church, there cannot be unreconciled relationships. Be reconciled to God; Be reconciled to each other, in the name of Christ.

                                                            AMEN
           




[i] Derek Tidball, The Message of the Cross  BST (adapted), 219.
[ii] John Stott, The Cross of Christ, 197.

No comments:

Post a Comment