Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Sayings of the Cross #3

“HERE IS YOUR SON”

Nothing brings us closer to the cross of Christ than the last words of Jesus. As we meditate on these words, rolling them around in our minds, and considering their importance for our lives, we can even imagine ourselves at the foot of the cross. In our mind’s eye we can almost reach out and touch the nailed feet of Jesus. Or at least I hope we can do that.
            The cross of Christ is central to our salvation. As Anabaptists we focus on the life of Jesus, his teachings, seeking to follow in his footsteps and be like him. But we cannot deny that the culmination of everything Jesus did and taught is found in the Crucifixion event. Without the Cross we just have teaching. Without the Cross we have no salvation. Without the Cross there is no resurrection, and ultimately there is no hope of eternal life.
            As Christians then, it is entirely appropriate for us to focus on the Cross of Christ, and to consider Jesus’ final words.
            This morning we have read the Scriptures regarding the third saying from the cross. It is admittedly an odd word. “Woman, here is your son…Here is your mother.” I have studied it from different angles and have not been satisfied with the various interpretations. I confess that my own application of this saying is my best attempt at interpreting a very difficult text beyond its own context.
            Why study it then? Because John included it for a reason that involves the reader of the gospel. John was not being arbitrary in selecting scenes to include in his gospel. He wrote that “these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name,” (Jn. 20:31).
            Join with me as we investigate this scene and discern its meaning for ourselves. If nothing else, let us gaze upon the scene and worship the Lord Jesus who hung upon the cross.

1. Jesus’ enemies loot his stuff

a) Cold greed – We begin our investigation with the context of the scene. Pilate has condemned Jesus to the cruel death of the cross to appease the will of the people. He carried his own cross to Golgotha (which means “the place of the skull”) or Calvary (Latin for skull). Jesus is crucified between two thieves. Pilate, in a successful attempt to annoy the chief priests places a title over Jesus head, “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.” They protest.
            Then the camera zooms in on four soldiers. The execution squad was always a group of four. It is plain to see that this execution is just another in the business of a Roman soldier. They ignore the man they nailed to a cross and instead begin to gamble for his clothes.
            How could they be so callous, so cold? How could they not know that the man they crucified on this day was no ordinary man? They were clearly desensitized to the violence of their work. By the time of Christ, crucifixion had become the favorite method of execution for non-Romans in the Roman Empire. Historians say that Rome had already crucified more than 30,000 people in and around Judea by this time. These soldiers were numb to the agony of Jesus.
b) The undergarment – Roman law gave the soldiers the right to the clothes of the executed man, “they took his clothes, dividing them into four shares, one for each of them, with the undergarment remaining,” (23).
            Most paintings of Jesus on the cross depict him with a loin cloth on him, as if it were underwear. John does not go into gory details about his wounds or the crucifixion – he is matter of fact – his readers know how horrible the cross can be. So he also assumes his readers know that Christ was naked on the cross. It was further humiliation for the victim of the cross. That they divide up his clothes is clear indication of this fact.
            You may find it appropriate that Christ was naked as he died for our sins when I remind you of the Garden scene. When Adam and Eve sinned and realized their nakedness, they hid in the garden when God came for a walk (Gen. 3:10). Somehow the shame of nakedness is connected with sin, and here Jesus is bearing that shame on the cross.
c) Prophecy fulfilled – The soldiers divide up Jesus’ clothes into four piles. Perhaps he had sandals, a belt, and a head covering. He would certainly have had an outer garment that was sewn together. But his undergarment, the fifth piece, was woven in one piece and could not be divided lest it lose its value. So the soldiers threw dice with each assigned a number to designate who the winner might be.
            John tells us that this is a direct fulfillment of the prophecy in Psalm 22:18 where David’s tormentors cast lots for his garments. This is applied to Christ. According to biblical scholars there are 332 distinct prophecies in the OT that have been directly fulfilled in the person of Jesus.
            In one sense, Jesus could not have made the soldiers do what they did. They gambled for his clothes out of their natural inclinations. On the other hand, God prophesied through David that they would do this – how amazing is that?
d) A gift from Mother? The undergarment is the key to the scene as we move from the gambling soldiers to the weeping women at the cross. According to legend, his mother gave this undergarment to Jesus. Mothers typically gave their sons a gift like this when they left home. If this is true, then as Jesus watched the soldiers gamble for his clothes, his eyes would have landed on the garment and triggered his thoughts of mother. In some translations there is a comma between v. 24 and 25, connecting the garment to what happens next. Some say “But there were standing near the cross of Jesus…” the four women and John.
            Chuck Swindoll writes, “Why now? She’s been there all along, watching and weeping. Why hasn’t He acknowledged or spoken to her? His outer garments were insignificant. But when they touched the tunic, they touched something very near to His heart – the garment made for Him by His mother.”[i]

2. Jesus’ family gathers at the Cross

a) Relative connections – In the midst of Pilate’s petty rivalries with the chief priests, the callous gambling of the soldiers, and the pain and humiliation of the cross itself, the scene is softened by Christ’s compassion for his mother.
            Standing at the cross that day was four women and the disciple whom Jesus loved – John, as we understand. Many women followed Jesus during his ministry and were very loyal. These women were related to Jesus specifically.
Mary – his mother; John does not mention her often in his gospel account. She appears at the wedding at Cana and here. When she and Joseph presented Jesus as a baby at the temple, old Simeon told her he would be great and that a sword would pierce her soul. This was the day.
Mary’s sister – Mark tells us her name was Salome and that she was the one who asked Jesus if her sons, James and John, could sit at the right and left of Jesus in his kingdom. No doubt she saw the horror of what she asked for as Jesus “sat upon his throne,” the cross, that day.
Mary, the wife of Clopas – another aunt of Jesus, she was the wife of Joseph’s brother, according to tradition.
Mary Magdalene – Jesus cast 7 demons out of her, changing her life forever.
And John, his youngest disciple, the one whom Jesus loved. All the other disciples ran away, but John came back.
b) Looking after Mother – Jesus looks down at Mary and remembers his responsibility to her as the oldest son. He has to take care of her. Jesus says to Mary, “Woman, here is your son,” and to John, “Here is your mother.”
            Jesus had brothers and sisters, why not leave Mary in their care? “In his concern for his mother he puts her in the care, not of his natural brothers who at this point do not believe, but of the other side of his family, in the person of his cousin John, where she would find a believing and supportive relationship.”[ii]
c) Why he called her “woman” – Did you notice that he called her woman? Not a very affectionate term is it?
            You remember the wedding at Cana? Mary comes up to Jesus when the wine ran out and said, “They have no more wine.” Jesus replied, “Dear woman, why do you involve me? My time has not yet come,” (Jn. 2:3-4). It seems like a tart reply but Jesus is not being disrespectful. He knows the law that says, “Honor your father and mother.”
            There are two sides to calling her “woman.” One is that in Jewish culture, instructions given by a dying man were like a last will and testament. Jesus was telling them his “will” and executing it at the same time. Knowing that he could not take care of his mother, Jesus entrusts her to John. As a widow she would have no support or CPP for her old age, so John would care for her. John records that, “From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.”
            Sharon and I heard the legends when we were in Ephesus eight years ago. When John went to minister in Ephesus, Mary came with him, and according to tradition, died there. John’s tomb is also in Ephesus bearing witness to a promise kept.
            The other side of calling his mother “woman” has to do with a theological separation. Both in John 2 and here in 19, Jesus calls her “woman” to indicate that he initiated the separation process from his mother. Jesus wants her to know that all earthly ties are over. It is not out of disrespect for her but out of necessity. More than a son, Mary needs a Savior. She was essential to the plan in Jesus’ becoming a man, but now she needs to see her place as a follower of Christ.
            Mary is not a co-redeemer as one church views her, the Queen of Heaven, but as one in need of redemption, just like we are. The sword pierces her soul and reveals to her that she is a sinner who needs Jesus to hang on that cross for her sins.

You see how difficult it is to apply this passage in a direct way to our lives? Here is my attempt at finding an application:
            There are two kinds of people pictured in the third saying from the cross. The first kind of people are gamblers. Not one person who has ever lived or lives today is really very far from the cross. Christ’s cross casts a shadow over the whole world and, as Paul says in Romans 1, men are without excuse. So in the shadow of the cross of Christ, with their backs turned to the ugly truth that Jesus, the Lamb of God, had to die for the sins of every person.
            These people are gambling that the material things of this life will satisfy their inner longings. Men and women scramble to get what they can, to get their share, and to grab whatever scraps are left lying around by poor losers.
            Some have turned towards the cross and admire it. They respect Jesus as the model of love and compassion, just as he showed to his mother while dying. What a good man he was. They may even worship him and revere him coming just short of committing their whole lives to him. They are gambling too, that partial devotion will be enough.
            The second group of people are a different sort. My second point was titled for a double meaning: “Jesus’ family gathers at the cross.” The cross is not to be respected, admired, or even revered. At the cross, with knees bent in humble submission, the sinner sees himself or herself upon the cross in the person of Jesus. At that moment of realization and acceptance of the saving work of Christ, we are adopted into the family of Christ. A new family is forged at the cross. Mary was adopted into God’s family when she put her faith in Christ for forgiveness of sins and salvation.
            Once when Mary and her sons came to drag Jesus away from this “insanity” of being the Messiah, someone told Jesus his mother and brothers wanted to speak to him. Jesus replied, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” Pointing to his disciples he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers. For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother,” (Matt. 12:48-49).
            The family of Jesus gathers at the cross. Recognizing the brothers and sisters of the cross, we model the compassion of Jesus by caring for one another as if we were tied by our genetics. Our whole family dynamic is revolutionized. Behold, your brothers and sisters in Christ (look around). This is your family.


                                                                        AMEN



[i] Chuck Swindoll, The Darkness and the Dawn, 2001, 153-154.
[ii] Bruce Milne, The Message of John, BST, 1993, 278.

No comments:

Post a Comment